Proto-Cities before Writing: Jericho, Çatalhöyük, and the Trypillia Mega-Sites

Long before cuneiform or hieroglyphs, Jericho, Çatalhöyük, and Ukraine's Trypillia mega-sites show how large settlements organized without writing.

5 August 2026 · Part of The Early Bronze Age →

Thousands of years before anyone pressed a reed stylus into wet clay, human beings were already living in walled towns, densely packed honeycomb settlements, and sprawling agricultural mega-sites larger than many medieval cities. Jericho's stone tower rose around 8000 BC. Çatalhöyük in central Anatolia housed thousands of people under one continuous roofline by 7000 BC. And on the fertile plains of what is now Ukraine, the Trypillia culture built settlements that, at their peak between 4100 and 3600 BC, sprawled across more than 300 hectares — larger than the earliest cities of Mesopotamia that would later invent writing. None of these places left a single inscription, because none of them needed to. Understanding how they functioned without a script forces a harder question than "when did cities begin": what, exactly, makes a settlement a city in the first place?

A City Is Not Defined by Its Alphabet

In 1950, archaeologist V. Gordon Childe published an influential list of ten traits he associated with the "urban revolution," the shift from village to city. His list included larger, denser populations; full-time specialists freed from farming; a surplus economy; monumental public architecture; a ruling class; long-distance trade; sophisticated art; and, as only one item among ten, writing. Childe built his model chiefly around early Mesopotamian cities like Uruk, where writing and urbanism arrived together around 3400 to 3200 BC. But archaeology since Childe's day has repeatedly found settlements that check several of his other boxes centuries or millennia earlier, without a script anywhere in sight. Scholars now generally call these places "proto-cities" or "mega-sites": large, dense, and socially complex, but without the administrative writing systems that traditionally defined "civilization."

That absence means everything historians know about these places comes from the ground itself, not from any voice the inhabitants left describing their own laws, kings, gods, or disputes. What survives is architecture, refuse, burials, tools, and, occasionally, wall art. Three sites illustrate the range of proto-urban life without writing: a fortified oasis town in the Jordan Valley, a sprawling agglomeration of mudbrick houses in Anatolia, and colossal ring-planned settlements on the Ukrainian steppe.

Jericho's Tower: Fortification without a Kingdom

At Tell es-Sultan, beside the freshwater spring of Ein es-Sultan in the Jordan Valley, a community of the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A period built a massive stone wall and an attached stone tower around 8000 BC, among the earliest large-scale stone construction known anywhere. The wall stood at least several meters high, and the tower rose roughly 8.5 meters, with an internal staircase leading to its summit. For decades this was described as the world's oldest city wall, built to defend Jericho's people and its precious spring from raiders. More recent scholarship has complicated that picture: some archaeologists argue the wall may have served partly to hold back seasonal flooding or mudslides from the hills above, rather than functioning purely as a military fortification. Either explanation points to the same underlying fact, that a community of a few hundred to perhaps a couple of thousand people organized enough collective labor to move and shape tons of stone for a shared structure, without any ruling bureaucracy known to have directed the work through written orders.

Jericho at this stage had no writing, no coinage, and, as far as excavation shows, no distinct palace or temple separating an elite from everyone else. What it had was permanence: a settlement occupying the same mound for millennia, rebuilt on top of itself so often that Tell es-Sultan today rises as an artificial hill layered with the debris of its own history. Fortification as a shared civic project would recur across later history, up to the elaborate concentric stonework of 13th-century French castles like Carcassonne, but Jericho's tower predates any of the centralized feudal or royal authority behind those later projects by many thousands of years.

Çatalhöyük: A Town with No Streets

Roughly a thousand kilometers northwest of Jericho, on the Konya Plain of central Turkey, Çatalhöyük grew from a small farming village around 7100 BC into one of the largest known Neolithic communities, with population estimates for its peak centuries ranging from a few thousand up to around eight to ten thousand people. What makes Çatalhöyük remarkable is not just its size but its layout: houses were built wall to wall in dense clusters with no streets or alleys between them. Residents entered through holes in the roof, climbing down ladders, and moved across the settlement by walking over the rooftops themselves.

Inside, houses were plastered and re-plastered, decorated with paintings of hunting scenes, geometric patterns, and the horns of aurochs mounted directly into walls and platforms. The dead were buried beneath the floors of the houses where the living continued to eat and sleep. Excavators led by Ian Hodder found almost no evidence of separate elite housing, temples, or granaries controlled by a distinct ruling group, which has led many archaeologists to describe Çatalhöyük's society as strikingly egalitarian, organized more around household and kin groups than around any central authority. Its rooftop-only layout also stands in sharp contrast to the deliberately gridded streets and fire-resistant building codes that Rome imposed on itself after the fire of 64 AD. Long-distance connections did exist even so: obsidian tools recovered at the site were traced to volcanic sources in Cappadocia, evidence that raw materials moved across meaningful distances through exchange networks centuries before anyone at Çatalhöyük wrote down a single trade agreement, much as the copper in Ötzi the Iceman's axe was later traced hundreds of kilometers from where he died, physical proof of exchange no contemporary document records.

The Trypillia Mega-Sites: Europe's Forgotten Giants

The most startling proto-cities of all were, until relatively recently, barely known outside specialist circles. Between roughly 4100 and 3600 BC, communities of the Cucuteni-Trypillia culture, spread across what is now Moldova, Romania, and Ukraine, built settlements that dwarfed anything else in prehistoric Europe. Sites such as Talianki, Maidanetske, and Nebelivka reached sizes of up to 320 hectares, with researchers estimating as many as 2,800 houses standing simultaneously and populations plausibly in the range of ten to fifteen thousand people or more. Aerial photography and geophysical survey, rather than excavation alone, first revealed the true scale of these places, since so little rose visibly above the modern ground surface.

Trypillia mega-sites were laid out in concentric rings of houses circling large open central areas, a plan that looks deliberate rather than accidental, though archaeologists still debate what organized it, given the absence of any monumental palace, temple, or fortification wall comparable to Jericho's. Houses appear similar in size to one another, which many researchers read as evidence against a sharply stratified elite, and some settlements show signs that houses were periodically and ritually burned, a practice whose purpose remains debated. Despite rivaling or exceeding early Mesopotamian cities in scale, the Trypillia mega-sites collapsed and were abandoned by around 3600 BC, centuries before writing appears anywhere in the record, without ever developing one of their own. The same Pontic-Caspian steppe country would later be home to the Scythians, another culture that left no script of its own; almost everything known about Scythian royal burial practice comes from Herodotus and archaeology rather than any indigenous Scythian text, much as everything known about the Trypillia mega-sites depends entirely on what survives in the ground.

Chronology

Living Without a Script

None of these communities were illiterate in the sense of having lost a writing system; they existed before writing was invented anywhere on Earth, so the concept simply did not apply. That has not stopped historians from asking how societies of thousands of people coordinated construction projects, distributed resources, and resolved disputes without any administrative record. The likeliest answer, pieced together from architecture and material culture, is that small-scale, face-to-face, kin-based, and ritual mechanisms did the work that written bureaucracy would later take over, rather than the tax rolls and law codes that define literate states like Mesopotamia or Egypt. Writing itself, when it did finally emerge at Uruk, grew directly out of accounting: clay tokens and sealed bullae used to track grain and livestock gradually flattened into the pictographic marks that became cuneiform, the same underlying problem of recording quantities that, thousands of years later, would still be driving the adoption of a whole new numeral system in medieval European trade.

That informal coordination had real limits. None of the three sites discussed here grew into the kind of centralized, multi-generational state that later literate civilizations built, and all eventually declined or were abandoned. Writing, once it appeared, proved an extraordinarily effective technology for holding larger and more hierarchical societies together, which is one reason the Bronze Age cities that followed, equipped with king lists, tax records, and law codes, were able to grow larger and endure longer than any Neolithic mega-site had. Even so, the reach of writing was never as complete as surviving monumental inscriptions can suggest; centuries after Rome fell, literacy across Western Europe contracted sharply back into monasteries and cathedral schools, a reminder that a script in a society's toolkit never guaranteed it reached most people within that society.

Conclusion

Jericho's tower, Çatalhöyük's honeycomb rooftops, and the vast rings of the Trypillia mega-sites all complicate the tidy story that cities and writing arrived together. Each site met some of the classic markers archaeologists associate with urban life, dense population, communal architecture, and long-distance exchange, while lacking others, most conspicuously a script. What they demonstrate is that large-scale human cooperation is older and more varied than the invention of writing, and that literacy, when it eventually appeared, was one tool among several that societies used to manage complexity, not the single threshold separating prehistory from civilization. The mega-sites and proto-cities that came before it remain, in the most literal sense, prehistoric: places whose story can only be read in stone, ash, and soil.

Frequently asked questions

What is a "proto-city"? A proto-city, or mega-site, is a large, dense prehistoric settlement that shows some features associated with urban life, such as substantial population size, communal architecture, or long-distance trade connections, but predates the writing systems traditionally used to define the beginning of "civilization" in places like Mesopotamia.

Was Çatalhöyük really a city if it had no streets or writing? Archaeologists debate the label, which is why many prefer "proto-city." Çatalhöyük had thousands of densely packed residents and shared architectural conventions, but its lack of streets, monumental public buildings, and any clear ruling elite sets it apart from later cities like Uruk, which combined comparable size with writing, temples, and centralized administration.

How much bigger were the Trypillia mega-sites than early Mesopotamian cities? At their peak between roughly 3800 and 3600 BC, the largest Trypillia mega-sites in Ukraine reached up to 320 hectares, a scale that matched or exceeded early Uruk-period Mesopotamian cities, even though Uruk would go on to develop writing while the Trypillia mega-sites were abandoned without ever adopting or inventing one.

Why did Jericho build a wall and tower so early, if not for writing or a king to organize it? Researchers still debate the primary purpose of Jericho's Pre-Pottery Neolithic A wall and tower, with defense against raiders and protection from seasonal flooding both proposed. Either way, its construction shows that a community could mobilize substantial collective labor for a shared structure through custom and cooperation, without needing writing or a centralized bureaucratic state to direct the work.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Affiliate links in Recommended reading — and in Further reading on older articles — may earn Writesides of History a commission at no extra cost to you.

From the archive